Other

DUCKY polymers take a quack at processing crude oil

A sample of a DUCKY polymer membrane. Photo: Candler Hobbs, Georgia Institute of Technology.

A new kind of polymer membrane created by researchers at Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) could reshape how refineries process crude oil, dramatically reducing the energy and water required while extracting even more useful materials.

The so-called DUCKY polymers are reported in a paper in Nature Materials. And they’re just the beginning for the team of Georgia Tech chemists, chemical engineers and materials scientists. They have also created artificial intelligence (AI) tools to predict the performance of these kinds of polymer membranes, which could accelerate development of new ones.

The implications are stark: the initial separation of crude oil components is responsible for roughly 1% of energy used across the globe. What’s more, the membrane separation technology the researchers are developing could have several uses, from biofuels and biodegradable plastics to pulp and paper products.

“We’re establishing concepts here that we can then use with different molecules or polymers, but we apply them to crude oil because that’s the most challenging target right now,” said M.G. Finn, professor in the School of Chemistry and Biochemistry.

Crude oil in its raw state includes thousands of compounds that have to be processed and refined to produce useful materials – gas and other fuels, as well as plastics, textiles, food additives, medical products and more. Squeezing out the valuable stuff involves dozens of steps, but it starts with distillation, a water- and energy-intensive process.

Researchers have been trying to develop membranes to do that work instead, filtering out the desirable molecules and skipping all the boiling and cooling.

“Crude oil is an enormously important feedstock for almost all aspects of life, and most people don’t think about how it’s processed,” said Ryan Lively, professor in the School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering. “These distillation systems are massive water consumers, and the membranes simply are not. They’re not using heat or combustion. They just use electricity. You could ostensibly run it off of a wind turbine, if you wanted. It’s just a fundamentally different way of doing a separation.”

What makes the team’s new membrane formula so powerful is a new family of polymers. The researchers used building blocks called spirocyclic monomers that assemble together in chains with lots of 90° turns, forming a kinky material that doesn’t compress easily and contains pores that selectively bind and permit desirable molecules to pass through. The polymers are not rigid, which means they’re easier to make in large quantities. They also have a well-controlled flexibility or mobility that allows pores of the right filtering structure to come and go over time.

The DUCKY polymers are created through a chemical reaction that’s easy to produce at a scale that would be useful for industrial purposes. It’s a member of a Nobel-Prize-winning family of reactions called click chemistry, and that’s what gives the polymers their name. The reaction is called copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition – abbreviated CuAAC and pronounced ‘quack’. Thus: DUCKY polymers.

In isolation, the three key characteristics of the polymer membranes aren’t new; it’s their unique combination that makes them a novelty and effective, Finn said.

The research team included scientists at ExxonMobil, who discovered just how effective the membranes could be. The company’s scientists took the crudest of the crude oil components – the sludge left at the bottom after the distillation process – and pushed it through one of the membranes. The process extracted even more valuable materials.

“That’s actually the business case for a lot of the people who process crude oils,” Lively said. “They want to know what they can do that’s new. Can a membrane make something new that the distillation column can’t? Of course, our secret motivation is to reduce energy, carbon and water footprints, but if we can help them make new products at the same time, that’s a win-win.”

Predicting such outcomes is one way the team’s AI models can come into play. In a related paper in Nature Communications, Lively and Finn, together with researchers in Rampi Ramprasad’s lab at Georgia Tech, described using machine-learning algorithms and mass-transport simulations to predict the performance of polymer membranes in complex separations.

“This entire pipeline, I think, is a significant development, and it’s also the first step toward actual materials design,” said Ramprasad, professor in the School of Materials Science and Engineering. “We call this a ‘forward problem’, meaning you have a material and a mixture that goes in – what comes out? That’s a prediction problem. What we want to do eventually is to design new polymers that achieve a certain target permeation performance.”

Complex mixtures like crude oil might have hundreds or thousands of components, so accurately describing each compound in mathematical terms, how it interacts with the membrane and extrapolating the outcome is ‘non-trivial’, as Ramprasad put it.

Training the algorithms also involved combing through all the experimental literature on solvent diffusion through polymers to build an enormous dataset. But, like the potential of membranes themselves to reshape refining, knowing ahead of time how a proposed polymer membrane might work would accelerate a materials-design process that’s basically trial-and-error now.

“The default approach is to make the material and test it, and that takes time,” Ramprasad said. “This data-driven or machine-learning-based approach uses past knowledge in a very efficient manner. It’s a digital partner: you’re not guaranteed an exact prediction, because the model is limited by the space spanned by the data you use to train it. But it can extrapolate a little bit and it can take you in new directions, potentially. You can do an initial screening by searching through vast chemical spaces and make ‘go, no-go’ decisions up front.”

Lively said he’d long been a skeptic about the ability of machine-learning tools to tackle the kinds of complex separations he works with. “I always said, ‘I don’t think you can predict the complexity of transport through polymer membranes. The systems are too big; the physics are too complicated. Can’t do it.’”

But then he met Ramprasad: “Rather than just be a naysayer, Rampi and I took a stab at it with a couple of undergrads, built this big database, and dang. Actually, you can do it.”

Developing the AI tools also involved comparing the algorithms’ predictions to actual results, including with the DUCKY polymer membranes. The experiments showed the AI models predictions were within 6% to 7% of actual measurements.

“It’s astonishing,” Finn said. “My career has been spent trying to predict what molecules are going to do. The machine-learning approach, and Rampi’s execution of it, is just completely revolutionary.”

This story is adapted from material from Georgia Tech, with editorial changes made by Materials Today. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of Elsevier. Link to original source.


Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button